Luana Santos vs. Stephanie Egger
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Luana Santos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.66 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Stephanie Egger
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.65 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Luana Santos
Distance 89.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 9.5% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 6.2%)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 6.2%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Luana Santos
Head 70.6% (norm 75.7%) · Body 21.4% (norm 15.5%) · Legs 8.0% (norm 8.4%)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.7%) · Body 9.7% (norm 15.5%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Santos L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 187 / 355 | 52.7% | 38.3% | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 38 | 50.0% | 75.2% | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 75.2% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 123 / 281 | 43.8% | 37.0% | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.0% |
| To the body | 61 / 85 | 71.8% | 71.2% | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 71.2% |
| To the legs | 26 / 32 | 81.2% | 80.8% | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 42 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 42 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Santos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 157 / 522 | 30.1% | 41.3% | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 39 / 53 | 73.6% | 74.7% | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 125 / 461 | 27.1% | 38.1% | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 52 / 77 | 67.5% | 73.2% | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 29 / 47 | 61.7% | 80.7% | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.7% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Santos has more cage time on record.