Skip to content
UFC simulation vs. the market Bout Simulator

The record

3Wins
0Losses
100.0%
2–0 Favourites below even
1–0 Underdogs +100 to +400
0–0 Longshots over +400
+$367
Total profit through the site
Crystal Brawl
$367 from 3 graded tier picks + $0 from 0 personal bets · $1,192 riding on 6 live tier picks

Too few graded bets to quote a return — 3 of the 30 needed. At this sample a percentage would be noise, not a rate, so we show the dollars and wait.

How often we pick the winner

every bout we called before the fight, graded — not just the bets
Full stackthe number we publish — the engine plus the analyst read
67% ± 16 pts · 6 of 9 fights
Engine alonethe simulator with the analyst layer switched off
67% ± 16 pts · 6 of 9 fights

One row per fight, the call frozen before it happened and never edited afterwards. The ± is one standard error: with this many fights the true rate could sit that far either side of the number. A fight where our number sat within 2 points of 50% is a coin flip — no call, so it is not scored (1 so far on the full stack, 1 on the engine alone).

By tier

Gap: our sim vs. de-vigged price

FAVOURITE

A favourite we rate higher still · 4+ pt gap · to win $150
2–0 Record
100.0%Win rate
+$199Profit
—Return
6 live · CLV +0.9 pts

UNDERDOG

A near-even underdog we rate higher · risk $150
1–0 Record
100.0%Win rate
+$168Profit
—Return
CLV −0.9 pts

LOW CONFIDENCE

Our read under 30% — tracked, never in the tier record
0–0 Record
—Win rate
—Profit
—Return

Kept out of the tier record on purpose.

ROI = profit over money risked · CLV = how far the no-vig market moved toward our side between the call and the close, in percentage points. Positive means the market came to us. Both ends are de-vigged consensus across every book in the capture, so the number is market movement and not the bookmaker's margin.

Live picks

6 frozen, waiting on a result
Pick GapPrice Our %Market % TierFightEvent
Karine Silva 13.9 -170
betonlineag
74.3% 60.4% FAVOURITE Karine Silva vs Gabriella Fernandes UFC Fight Night 293
November 7, 2026
Elijah Smith 11.9 -172
betonlineag
77.9% 66.0% FAVOURITE Davey Grant vs Elijah Smith UFC Fight Night 293
November 7, 2026
Tatiana Suarez 6.4 -160
betonlineag
69.1% 62.7% FAVOURITE Tatiana Suarez vs Virna Jandiroba UFC Fight Night: Cortes-Acosta vs. Walker
November 7, 2026
Waldo Cortes-Acosta 6.3 -185
betonlineag
69.2% 62.9% FAVOURITE Waldo Cortes-Acosta vs Johnny Walker UFC Fight Night: Cortes-Acosta vs. Walker
November 7, 2026
Chris Duncan 16.6 -155
betonlineag
74.9% 58.3% FAVOURITE Drew Dober vs Chris Duncan UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit
November 14, 2026
Navajo Stirling 15.9 -140
betonlineag
69.7% 53.8% FAVOURITE Jiří Procházka vs Navajo Stirling UFC Fight Night: Procházka vs. Stirling
November 21, 2026

scroll for more →

Settled

3 graded · nothing is ever removed
PickResult GapPrice UnitsCLV TierWinnerEvent
Tom Nolan WON 9.0 +112 +1.12 -0.9 UNDERDOG Tom Nolan UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan
October 31, 2026
Jacobe Smith WON 7.8 -250 +0.40 +1.4 FAVOURITE Jacobe Smith UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan
October 31, 2026
Cody Durden WON 5.6 -108 +0.93 +0.5 FAVOURITE Cody Durden UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan
October 31, 2026

scroll for more →

How to read this. Every call is graded like a real bet. A unit is $150, 1.5% of a $10,000 starting bankroll. A favourite is bet to win one unit — at -150 we risk $225 to win $150 — and an underdog risks one unit, so every call has about the same upside. No bet risks more than $450, and one card never carries more than $750 in total. How strongly we disagree with the bookmakers does not change the size: across hundreds of past fights, bigger disagreements did not win more often. Return is profit divided by everything we risked. A bout where our number sits within 2 points of 50% is a coin flip: no call, no stake, and it never reaches this ledger. The headline and the three price buckets count every graded bet, so favourites + underdogs + longshots always add up to the record above. The tier cards below use a stricter cut — they leave out the low-confidence board — because that is the number the engine is judged by.
Why the board starts at zero · engine backtest

No back-dated tier record — on purpose.

A tier needs the betting line it disagreed with. We started logging lines on 5 August 2026 and the odds feed doesn't sell the past, so the board starts at zero rather than inventing one.

What we can show: the simulator replayed over 8,312 real fights on information available before each one — 60.1% of winners overall, 64.0% from 2023 on. That's the engine, not a tier record.

Analysis and entertainment only. Nothing here is betting advice.