Sara McMann vs. Alexis Davis
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Sara McMann
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.88 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Alexis Davis
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.68 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 32 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.4 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Sara McMann
Distance 59.5% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 11.5% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 29.0% (norm 6.2%)
Alexis Davis
Distance 83.3% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 8.7% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 8.0% (norm 6.2%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Sara McMann
Head 78.4% (norm 75.7%) · Body 16.0% (norm 15.5%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 8.4%)
Alexis Davis
Head 69.6% (norm 75.7%) · Body 12.3% (norm 15.5%) · Legs 18.2% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | McMann L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Davis L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 90 / 347 | 25.9% | 38.3% | 566 / 1326 | 42.7% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 67 | 82.1% | 75.2% | 91 / 138 | 65.9% | 75.2% |
| On the ground | 114 / 169 | 67.5% | 70.8% | 97 / 127 | 76.4% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 166 / 457 | 36.3% | 37.0% | 379 / 1107 | 34.2% | 37.0% |
| To the body | 67 / 93 | 72.0% | 71.2% | 135 / 195 | 69.2% | 71.2% |
| To the legs | 26 / 33 | 78.8% | 80.8% | 240 / 289 | 83.0% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 42 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 42 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs McMann L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Davis L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 109 / 282 | 38.7% | 41.3% | 621 / 1505 | 41.3% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 65 | 84.6% | 74.7% | 60 / 85 | 70.6% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 91 / 109 | 83.5% | 74.2% | 65 / 71 | 91.5% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 193 / 384 | 50.3% | 38.1% | 550 / 1404 | 39.2% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 43 / 52 | 82.7% | 73.2% | 115 / 154 | 74.7% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 19 / 20 | too few to rate | 80.7% | 81 / 103 | 78.6% | 80.7% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Davis has more cage time on record.